A. Relations with the West: recovery of tariff autonomy and foreign concessions
In dealing with the Western powers, the KMT government was more successful:
- In 1927, the establishment of the national government in Nanking quickly received recognition from the foreign powers. (Even Japan, who did not like the KMT, recognized the Nanking government in 1929.)
- Thereafter, for the first time since 1911, China could speak as a unified country in international meetings.
- By 1933, after repeated negotiations with the foreign powers, tariff autonomy was restored to China (by which China had the independent right to decide on her level of tariffs). Previously the tariff was fixed at 5%; now it was raised to 7.5%. With more income, the KMT government could better modernize itself.
- Some foreign concessions were also restored to China after the unification of 1928.
B. Relations with Japan: from submission to resistance
As we shall see, Chiang Kai-shek concentrated on the internal extermination of the Communists during the period. He therefore submitted to Japan's aggression until the formation of the Second KMT-CCP Coalition in 1936, when he was ready for national resistance.
A. The KMT's only chance
Before 1928, China was territorially divided among the selfish warlords. After 1937, China was conquered by the Japanese. It was, therefore, during the 10 years between these dates that the KMT had a fair chance to rule and modernize the country. It was during these 10 years that the achievements and the shortcomings of the KMT became obvious. As it happened, the KMT failed in its mission. Chiang Kai-shek wasted 10 years, and lost China.
B. The KMT's failure
Of Sun Yat-sen's Three Principles of the People (Nationalism, Democracy and Socialism), the Nanking government fulfilled little. National unification was in general achieved only as late as 1936. Really democratic practice had made little advance by 1937. And social reform was hopelessly inadequate throughout the period. As a military man, Chiang Kai-shek did not understand the importance and urgency of social reform in China. He was intent on maintaining the KMT's ruling position by means of military power, not by social revolution. The Communists' violent social revolution alarmed him more than anything else, and he was determined to destroy Communism in China at all costs. That is why, during the ten years from 1928 to 1937, he made alliances with the traditional forces of the old society - landlords, scholar-gentry, militarists, merchants and traders - to counter the Communist threat. Many of these corrupt conservatives obtained important government positions. In this way, the KMT was turned .into a reactionary party opposed to all social changes. In the eyes of the peasants, Chiang was just one of the warlords.
C. Some considerations of fairness
We must be fair, however. In putting blame on Chiang Kai-shek and the KMT for failing to reform Chinese society, we must at the same time consider the many problems and difficulties they faced:
- Externally, there was Japanese aggression. Because of this, for example, Chiang's anti-Communist campaigns twice had to be called off.
- Internally, there were the challenges from disloyal warlords, disobedient KMT members, and, most troublesome of all, the Communists. Political control of the country was incomplete, thus making reform impossible to be carried out in all China. The harmful social effects of the warlord period (1916-1928) were too many and too difficult to remove.
- In such circumstances, it could be said that Chiang Kaishek was forced to rule with military power alone, to the neglect of social and economic reforms. And in view of the unfavourable conditions, such reforms might still have failed even if the KMT had had both the intention and ability to carry them out.
D. The irony of history
Indeed, history did not treat the Nanking government leniently:
- Generally effective rule over the country at large was not possible until 1936, when KMT troops, chasing after the Communists, succeeded in establishing real control over former warlords in Central and South China. By then, however, the Japanese were about to invade China, which they did a year later, in 1937. The Nanking government, after retreating to Southwest China. found itself ruling again just a small part of Chinese territory. The KMT's chance of reforming all of China was forever lost.
- It was only during the journey of retreat to the southwest in 1937-8 that the KMT men came into close contact with the backward countryside and realized how serious China's rural social problems were. By then, however, the KMT's opportunity of curing China's social ills had gone. As seen, it was the Communists who took over the job.